The impact of constitutional court decision number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on labor law in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the impact of Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on Labor Law in Indonesia. The research method used was normative juridical analysis, which examines legal issues through legislation, particularly the Job Creation Law, literature, and other reference materials. The result of this study is Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023, which granted part of the judicial review petition, namely that 21 norms in the Job Creation Law have shown significant steps in protecting workers' rights in Indonesia. This ruling confirms that several provisions in the Job Creation Law are contrary to constitutional principles, especially those related to the protection of workers' rights. The government and the House of Representatives (DPR) of the Republic of Indonesia must prepare a new labor law that implements Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023. In the future, collaboration between the government, employers, and labor unions/worker unions will be key to realizing a fair and sustainable labor system in Indonesia.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Agusmidah, 2010, “Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia: Dinamika & Kajian Teori”, cet. 1, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Agustianto, 2021, “Bentuk-Bentuk Perubahan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, Vol. XXV No. 2.
Bambang Sunggono, 2003, “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum”, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Cornelia Indira Kusuma Bahari dan Emmilia Rusdiana, 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Paruh Waktu Untuk Mendapatkan Hak Cuti Tahunan.” E-journal Unesa.
Dionisius Narjoko, “Policy Brief: Menanggapi Akibat Globalisasi Terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Kerja: Pengalaman dari Sektor Tekstil dan Garmen Indonesia”, website: http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/aki/_pdf/_onGoingProjects/_indonesia/pbEmploymentDriverspdf.
FX Djumialdji dan Wiwoho Soedjono, 2001, “Perjanjian Perburuhan dan Hubungan Perburuhan Pancasila”, Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.
Heru Budi Utoyo dan Mashari, 2022, “Pengaruh Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law) Bagi Pekerja/Buruh Dalam Hubungan Kerja di Perusahaan”, website: https://ejurnal.politeknikpratama.ac.id/index.php/jhpis/article/view/1751.
Hirawan, F.B. et al., 2023, “Kajian UU 11/2020 tentang Cipta Kerja Klaster Ketenagakerjaan: Studi pada Regulasi Pengupahan, PHK, dan Pesangon”, Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 18(1), website : https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v18i1.205.
I Ketut Satria Wiradharma Sumertajaya, dkk., 2024, “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/Puu-Xxi/2023 Terhadap Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT)”, Jurnal Yustisia, Vol. 19 No. 2.
Iman Soepomo, Hukum Perburuhan Bidang Hubungan Kerja, 1987, Jakarta: Djambatan.
Nikodemus Maringan, 2015, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja
(PHK) secara sepihak Oleh Perusahaan”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, Edisi 3, Volume 3.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2017, “Penelitian Hukum”, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 tertanggal 31 Oktober 2024.
Rusyiana, Ilma Amalia, Nor Isma, Widi Pandu Ardiyanto, Muhammad Wildan Aulia Fahmi, Diena Mawaddah, Devi Noviarani. 2025, “Analisis Putusan Mk Nomor 168/Puu-Xxi/2023: Implikasi Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Pekerja Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 11 (7.A).
Suharsimi Arikunto, 2013, “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek”, Cet.XI, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Suhartoyo Suhartoyo, 2019, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Buruh Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Nasional”, Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2.2.
Sugiyono, 2008, “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D”, Cet. 6, Bandung: Alfabeta.