Perbandingan sistem hukum common law dan civil law dalam konteks masyarakat majemuk
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis perbandingan sistem hukum common law dan civil law dalam mengakomodasi pluralitas masyarakat majemuk. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif komparatif dengan teknik analisis deskriptif-komparatif terhadap literatur hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan putusan pengadilan dari negara representatif kedua sistem. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa common law memiliki fleksibilitas tinggi melalui doktrin stare decisis dan interpretasi yudisial kontekstual yang memungkinkan adaptasi cepat terhadap dinamika sosial, namun menghadapi tantangan kepastian hukum. Sebaliknya, civil law menawarkan kepastian melalui kodifikasi sistematis namun kurang responsif terhadap keragaman nilai lokal. Dalam konteks Indonesia sebagai negara civil law dengan masyarakat majemuk, diperlukan konvergensi antara kepastian kodifikasi dan fleksibilitas yudisial untuk mewujudkan sistem hukum yang responsif terhadap pluralitas tanpa mengorbankan kepastian hukum. Penelitian merekomendasikan adopsi prinsip interpretasi kontekstual dan pengakuan pluralisme hukum dalam kerangka kodifikasi nasional.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer. Kencana.
Aulia, F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2017). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Islamic Law dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Karakteristik Berpikir. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(1), 98–113. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/5993
Bendor, A. L. (2013). The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse. Symposium: Justice Aharon Barak, 47(2), 331–337. https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2816&context=tlr
Butt, S. (2012). Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: Conservative activist or strategic operator? In The Judicialization of Politics in Asia (pp. 98–116). Routledge.
Cappelletti, M. (1981). The doctrine of stare decisis and the civil law: A fundamental difference-or no difference at all? JCB Mohr.
Carle, S. D. (2023). Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals, 1, 1–24. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3236&context=facsch_lawrev
Dainow, J. (1966). The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 15(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/838275
David, R., & Brierley, J. E. C. (1978). Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. Free Press.
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932).
Edwards v Canada (A-G) (1930).
Erlangga, A. S., & Poespasari, E. D. (2024). Comparison of Civil Law and Common Law Legal Systems in the Application of Jurisprudence. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6 SE-Articles), 2229–2235. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.649
Fauzi, M., & Haris, A. (2021). Hukum adat dalam perspektif pluralisme hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 10(2), 231–248.
Fon, V., & Parisi, F. (2006). Judicial precedents in civil law systems: A dynamic analysis. International Review of Law and Economics, 26(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2007.01.005
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pvIWAwAAQBAJ
Fuady, M. (2005). Perbandingan hukum perdata. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Furnivall, J. (2010). Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511707964
Glenn, H. P. (2010). Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Holdsworth, W. S. (1915). The Early History of Equity. Michigan Law Review, 13(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1274509
Hooker, M. B. (1978). Adat Law in Modern Indonesia. Oxford University Press.
Husa, J. (2018). Developing Legal System, Legal Transplants, and Path Dependence: Reflections on the Rule of Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 6(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy008
Irianto, S. (2016). Pluralisme hukum waris dan keadilan perempuan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (1973).
Legrand, P. (1996). European legal systems are not converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300058656
Lenaerts, K. (2015). The Court of Justice as the guarantor of the rule of law within the European Union. In The contribution of international and supranational courts to the rule of law (pp. 242–264). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lindsey, T., & Butt, S. (2018). Indonesian law. Oxford University Press.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992).
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eUVIEAAAQBAJ
Merryman, J. H. (1978). On the Convergence (And Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law. In New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe/Nouvelles perspectives d’un droit commun de l’Europe (pp. 195–233). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004633476_011
Merryman, J., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2023). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America, Fourth Edition. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=W4N-DwAAQBAJ
Na’im, A., & Syaputra, H. (2011). Kewarganegaraan, Suku Bangsa, Agama, dan Bahasa Sehari-hari Penduduk Indonesia: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Pejovic, C. (2001). Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal. Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo, 40, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5873
Pusat Studi Konstitusi FH Andalas. (2016). Perkembangan Pengujian Perundang- Undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 147–224. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk766
R v Morgentaler (1988).
Rahardjo, S. (2020). Ilmu Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Siregar, P. J. W. S. (2022). Perbandingan sistem hukum civil law dan common law dalam penerapan yurisprudensi ditinjau dari politik hukum. Dharmasisya:Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(2), 37.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Suhartanto, F. P., & Febrianty, Y. (2024). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law dan Common Law. Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(3), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v1i3.218
Tamanaha, B. (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244676.001.0001
Tegnan, H. (2015). Legal pluralism and land administration in West Sumatra: the implementation of the regulations of both local and nagari governments on communal land tenure. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(2), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1072386
Tetley, W. (2000). Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law v. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified). Louisiana Law Review, 3(60).
Tyler, T. R. (2017). Methodology in legal research. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3).
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan, Pub. L. No. 1 (1974).
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama, Pub. L. No. 7 (1989).
Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) Tahun 1945 Dan Amandemen Nomor - Tentang UUD 1945 Dan Amandemen (1945).
van Vollenhoven, C., Holleman, J. F., & Sonius, H. W. J. (2013). Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law. Springer Netherlands. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8_LqCAAAQBAJ
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1987). Introduction to Comparative Law. Clarendon Press.